If a person or organization is accused of something illegal or otherwise untoward, we will give that person or organization a chance to respond. If they respond publicly, we will include their statement—which may be edited for length or clarity—in our reporting.
We will not refer to a person’s race, religion, sexual orientation, skin colour or physical ability unless it is absolutely necessary or germane to the story. In representing Ontario’s diverse population, our journalists strive for inclusive, respectful reporting that reflects all communities without bias or stereotyping.
Our journalists avoid language or imagery that may perpetuate hate, discrimination, or prejudice against any group or individual based on race, ethnicity, gender, orientation, religion, or other personal characteristics.
We sometimes interview people under the age of 18, typically for stories centred around education or extraordinary achievements in academics, music, sports, or other subjects. When covering sensitive subjects involving children or teens (such as crime stories), we are careful not to include any identifying information not supplied by police or the child’s parents/legal guardians.
If the information in an article is sensitive, we believe the family of the child or teen should be contacted prior to an interview.
We will not publish social media posts or videos we believe will be harmful to a child, teen or vulnerable person of any age (such as someone experiencing a mental health or other medical emergency).
While we do publish photos and videos of crime scenes and traffic collisions, we will not show an image of an injured or deceased person unless the circumstances are extraordinary.
While we do pay for some photo and video content on a case-by-case basis, we do not pay for information and will not provide any payment for tips, forwarded documents or interviews.
Our journalists respect the privacy of individuals and avoid unwarranted intrusion. Extra care is taken in stories involving children, victims of crime, and other vulnerable individuals. While public figures are subject to a higher level of scrutiny, our journalists differentiate between relevant public interest and matters that do not affect the public.
We do not write voyeuristic or exploitative stories about people involved in high-profile crimes or scandals (as either victims or accusers). We do not send reporters to private households to conduct “ambush” interviews.
We will use publicly available posts on social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, etc) in our reporting and we generally do not ask permission before embedding or quoting a publicly available post in our articles. We will not post any posts or videos that we believe to be exploitative and we will not use underhanded tactics to gain access to private postings that members of the public are not privy to.
When we are covering events or reaching out for interviews, we identify ourselves as journalists working on a story for INsauga.com. When we conduct restaurant or Top 5 reviews, we do not because we want to ensure we do not receive any special treatment that could bias our review from management or staff.
While we try to avoid using anonymous sources, we will use them if the story requires the person’s participation and we have evidence revealing our source’s name could be harmful.
If a source wishes to be kept anonymous, we must still corroborate their claims with the person or organization they have brought to our attention. We will not publish any articles based on rumours, hearsay or conjecture.
At INSauga Inc., we are committed to the values of transparency, integrity, respect, and public service that are foundational to high-quality journalism in Ontario. Every employee at INsauga Inc. is expected to uphold these values, ensuring that our work contributes positively to public knowledge and civic engagement.